Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>>> Patch applied. Thanks.
>>> I added a comment about the unused bits in the header file.
>> Has anyone bothered to measure the overhead added by having to mask to
>> fetch or store the natts value? This is not a zero-cost improvement.
>
> SHOW ALL has:
>
> log_temp_files | -1 | Log the use of temporary files larger than th
>
> and pg_settings has:
>
> log_temp_files | -1 | kB | Reporting and Logging / What to Log
>
> Looks OK to me.
What? I'm completely lost here. What does log_temp_files have to do with
the bits on the tuple header?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
