Ron Johnson wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/08/07 20:39, Tom Lane wrote:
John Sales <spelunker334@yahoo.com> writes:
By doing this, I'm hoping that the query optimizer is smart
enough to see that if a query comes in and requests only the
six columns (that are in the narrower table) that PostgreSQL
won't have to load the wider table into the buffer pool, and
thereby actually have to only access about 10% the amount of
disk that it presently does.
Is this a sound theory?
No. It still has to touch the second table to confirm the
existence of rows to join to.
But if a query /requests *only* the six columns (that are in the
narrower table)/, why will the optimizer care about the other 224
columns?
It would. A query that uses an inner join implies that a matching entry must exist in both tables - so the join must occur, otherwise you could be returning rows that don't satisfy the join condition.
--
Chander Ganesan
Open Technology Group, Inc.
One Copley Parkway, Suite 210
Morrisville, NC 27560
Phone: 877-258-8987/919-463-0999
http://www.otg-nc.com
Expert PostgreSQL Training: http://www.otg-nc.com/training-courses/category.php?cat_id=8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFo5ZfS9HxQb37XmcRAtDRAJ41kKEN1Dv1iKXosTjy6IvMZKGccACfcZc9
e4pV+u0uLFisHcLu/gyuCvE=
=q44l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org/
