Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> All have been awaiting review for at least a month (though in one case
>> the latest version is quite recent). They probably ought to be on the
>> hold queue; all are ready to be reviewed for final
>> application/rejection.
>>
>> I'd hasten to add that none of those are mine. My patches have received
>> good attention, so I'm not complaining just completing admin.
>
> You might remember months ago that people were complaining I was pushing
> things into CVS too quickly, so while the patches are in my mailbox,
> they are not in the queue until I feel the community has the time to
> focus on it.
So, there's a queue of patches in your mailbox waiting to get to the
queue? A queue to the queue :). All the patches clearly need review, so
let's not rush them into the CVS, but it'd be nice to have them all in
one queue.
Ps. I agree with the later comments that the naming of the two patch
queues is a bit confusing. Having queues named after the release numbers
the patches are targeted for seems like a good idea.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com