Re: ideas for auto-processing patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tino Wildenhain
Subject Re: ideas for auto-processing patches
Date
Msg-id 459DFABF.5010400@wildenhain.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ideas for auto-processing patches  (markwkm@gmail.com)
Responses Re: ideas for auto-processing patches  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
markwkm@gmail.com schrieb:
> On 1/4/07, Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
...
>> Pulling branches from
>> anonvcvs regularly might be burdensome bandwidth-wise. So, like you 
>> say, a
>> local mirror would be beneficial for patch testing.
> 
> Right some sort of local mirror would definitely speed things up.

Easier speedup in this regard would be using subversion instead
of cvs. It transfers only diffs to your working copy (or rather,
to your last checkout) so its really saving on bandwidth.

Regards
Tino


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with windows installer
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with windows installer