Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Benjamin Arai
Subject Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think)
Date
Msg-id 458D867C.5000207@araisoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think)  ("A. Kretschmer" <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>)
Responses Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think)  (Benjamin Arai <me@benjaminarai.com>)
List pgsql-general
Function Scan on "getTimeSeries"  (cost=0.00..12.50 rows=1000 width=24)
(actual time=11065.981..11067.008 rows=262 loops=1)
 Total runtime: 11067.991 ms
(2 rows)

It is a PL function.  Do I need to break it down?

A. Kretschmer wrote:
> am  Sat, dem 23.12.2006, um 11:26:08 -0800 mailte Benjamin Arai folgendes:
>
>> because it would literally take over a week to complete.  Any help would
>> be greatly appreciated.
>>
>
> What says an 'explain analyse'?
>
>
> Andreas
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Problem with large table not using indexes (I think)
Next
From: Benjamin Arai
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Problem with large table not using indexes (I think)