Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Glen Parker wrote:
>> That really seems like something that, if it's powerful, would also be
>> very complicated. If the autovacuum system could just call a user
>> defined function, all the complexity could be dropped back into the
>> admin's lap (which is fine with me :-).
>
> I have a quote by Larry Wall about something similar:
>
> "In fact, the basic problem with Perl 5's subroutines is that they're
> not crufty enough, so the cruft leaks out into user-defined code
> instead, by the Conservation of Cruft Principle."
> (Larry Wall, Apocalypse 6)
>
> With the system described above, you can have it very simple by just not
> configuring anything. Or you can have a very complex scenario involving
> holidays and weekends and off-hours and "the two hours of the month when
> you do all the nasty stuff" by doing a very elaborate and complicated
> setup. Or you could have a middle ground just defining "off hours"
> (weekends and nights) which would be just a couple of commands.
I would go one step further and suggest that when the maintenance window
system gets completed we give it a default setup of midnight to 6AM or
something like that.
