Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
Date
Msg-id 458106.1763868356@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> That'd leave only Cygwin with HAVE BUGGY_STRTOF.  Perhaps they have
> fixed their implementation[1]?  Here's an experimental patch to drop
> all remnants, which could be used to find out.  No Windows/Cygwin
> here.  Hmm, what if we just commit it anyway?  If their strtof() is
> still broken and someone out there is running the tests and sees this
> test fail, why shouldn't they take that up with libc at this stage?

Hmm, we could get rid of the whole resultmap mechanism ...

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
Next
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove unused fields from BufferCacheNumaRec