Re: Performance of ORDER BY - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Subject Re: Performance of ORDER BY
Date
Msg-id 4575CEBC.9030202@kaltenbrunner.cc
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance of ORDER BY  ("Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:02:06PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In 8.0 that might be counterproductively high --- we have seen cases
>> where more sort_mem = slower with the older sorting code.  I concur
>> with Luke's advice that you should update to 8.2 (not 8.1) to get the
>> improved sorting code.
>
> By the way, is the new sorting code any better for platforms that already
> have a decent qsort() (like Linux)?

yes - especially on-disk sorts will get some tremendous speedups in 8.2.


Stefan

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Restart time
Next
From: "Jens Schipkowski"
Date:
Subject: Re: single transaction vs multiple transactions