Wm.A.Stafford wrote:
> I'm trying to use a temporary sequence to duplicate the functionality
> of the Oracle rownum pseudo-column
> as suggested by Scott Marlow in the archives:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2005-05/msg00126.php.
>
> The Oracle based application I'm porting to PostgreSQL used rownum to
> select the 'next' block of rows to
> process by specifying a where clause with something like " where
> rownum>x and rownum<y "
>
> My basic PostgreSQL query is:
>
> drop sequence rownum ;
> create temp sequence rownum;
>
> select B.rownum , B.id from
> (select nextval('rownum') as rownum, A.* from
> (select distinct id from ... where ... order by ... DESC
> ) as A
> ) as B
> where id>0
>
> This basic query produces the following result set:
> rownum id
> --------+---------
> 1 10038
> 2 10809
> 3 10810
> 4 22549
> 5 23023
>
> However, if I add a where clause referencing rownum for example: where
> id>0 and rownum>0
> I get the following:
>
> rownum id
> -------+---------
> 11 10038
> 12 10809
> 13 10810
> 14 22549
> 15 23023
>
> It appears as if rownum has been incremented as a result of three
> passes over the five row result set.
>
> Can someone explain what is going on? And more to to point, if this
> is expected behavior, is there a standard PostgreSQL way to select a
> 'block' of rows from a result set based on row number?
>
> Thanks,
> -=bill
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
I have done this using limit and offset like the following
select * from foo order by bar limit 10 offset 50;--giving the 10 rows
from position 51 onwards (offset is zero based)
Oisin
