Re: RC1 blocker issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Subject Re: RC1 blocker issues
Date
Msg-id 45677DEE.2090903@kaltenbrunner.cc
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RC1 blocker issues  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> * possible rearrangement of pg_stat column order:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00643.php
>> Should we do this, and if so should we force initdb (via a catversion
>> change)?  I'm currently leaning to the thought that if we change it
>> we should force initdb, else we'll risk having a noticeable user-visible
>> difference between different "8.2" installations.
> 
> Actually, on looking closer, we *must* force initdb because this changes
> the expected output for the rules regression test.
> 
> So, yea or nay?  I'm working up the patch right now, but will hold off
> applying until I hear some comments.

I would like to see it changed - even late into the beta cycle ...



Stefan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Day and month name localization uses wrong