Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl
Date
Msg-id 45621ABA.8080502@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl  ("Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl
List pgsql-hackers
Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> I might be one of the ones who depends on the same interpreter.  In your new
> scheme, the _SHARED hash will only be shared between like interpreters,
> correct?  This is going to force me to switch all of my perl code to use the
> plperlu interpreter :(
>
>   

Yes. Sorry, but I can't see any way around it. If anyone can suggest one 
then speak up loudly ASAP.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Severity of elog(FATAL) should vary by process
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Custom Data Type Question