On 18 Nov 2006 at 18:12, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > ------- Original Message -------
> > From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
> > To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> > Sent: 18/11/06, 17:38:45
> > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [CORE] SPF Record ...
> >
> > That is not true .. that is only true if we publish -all ... if we publish
> > ?all, we are saying that anything coming from "a mx" are *definitely* from
> > @postgresql.org, and that from other sources they *might* be ...
>
> So what's the point then? People either ignore the SPF record, or
> refuse mail from the 'might be's'.
These are inaccurate conclusions. SPF information helps to draw a
conclusion. Consider it a points system. Get so many points for a
might be, none for a definitely. Get enough points, you're spam.
SPF is most wisely used in conjunction with other information to
reach a conclusion.
--
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
