Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
Date
Msg-id 455864F8.3070706@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
Responses Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>> I am still wondering why the PostgreSQL *community* is trying to compete
>> with the MySQL *Corporation*.
>>
>
> Well, because PostgreSQL does not really have a Corporation, and MySQL
> does not really have a Community.
>
> However, they both want to see their products do well and gain mind and
> market share. I think our advocacy efforts are severely lacking at the
> moment, and I'd certainly not be adverse to seeing more effort by both
> the PG community and the PG corporations to fix this. And yes, MySQL
> is certainly one of our competitors: saying otherwise is wishful thinking
> at best.
>
I believe you know, that you don't have to convince me that we need
better advocacy. My point is...
MySQL in general isn't the target. We don't have to care if you are a
MySQL or Oracle developer.
We just need to positively advocate *our* database. The rest will fall
into place on its own.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> - --
> Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
> PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200611121954
> http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iD8DBQFFV8KhvJuQZxSWSsgRAt6EAKDblaGn4csG9+fEAU5emIMdwcKfLgCgnC3p
> KpiwqvKLkCg5u1pKjyFG0bQ=
> =9E4N
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
>


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
Next
From: Chris Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0