Re: plperl/plperlu interaction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: plperl/plperlu interaction
Date
Msg-id 45410505.8080502@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plperl/plperlu interaction  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: plperl/plperlu interaction  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>   
>> Anyway, it is probably not expected by many users that loading a module 
>> in plperlu makes it available to plperl  - I was slightly surprised 
>> myself to see it work and I am probably more aware than most of perl and 
>> plperl subtleties.
>>     
>
> I think that is a bug and needs to be fixed.  We have the precedent of
> pltcl, which uses separate interpreters for pltcl and pltclu for exactly
> this reason.
>
>   

Fair enough.

I am not sure what our release timetable is - and presumably this should 
also be backpatched if we regard it as a bug. I won't be able to do much 
on this front for the next 2 weeks at least.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GUC description cleanup
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication documentation addition