Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have started work on a list of Postgres derived databases
>> [1]. It would probably make sense to only cover PostgreSQL
>> derived databases, which would drop Illustra and PostgreSQL
>> itself from the list.
>>
>> Also it would make sense to add to this table a number of fields:
>> - name of the company that owns/develops the database
>> - availability (since/until)
>>
>> Maybe it also makes sense to list if they contribute code
>> back at all or not. Not sure.
>>
>> It might make sense to add this to the about section of the
>> main site [2]. Its sort of marketing-ish I would say
>>
>> I never added anything to the PostgreSQL site, so before I go
>> through the trouble of finding the ins and outs I wanted to
>> get a go ahead from this list. If I do get a go ahead a few
>> pointers about how to proceed would also be nice.
>
> I think this sounds interesting. Your options are basicalyl either to
> use techdocs (which would make it really easy to add), or to create a
> standard page. To create a standard page, look at the stuff that's in
> template/ in the web cvs tree
> (http://gborg.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/portal/template/?cvsroot
> =pgweb) to see how they are made.
Well like I said in the email I think it belongs best on the main site
in the about section. If you guys agree with this, I will write a patch.
regards,
Lukas
