Re: On what we want to support: travel? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Date
Msg-id 453E9FFD.20203@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: On what we want to support: travel?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Andrew,
>
>> 1.      Do we think it is a good idea, in general, to fund
>> individuals' travel, assuming such individuals are fairly prominent
>> members of the community?
>
> Yes.   Currently, the only people capable of speaking for PostgreSQL who
> also have jobs that pay them to do public speaking frequently are me,
> Bruce, and Gavin (plus others in Japan).  There are more than 100 open
> source conferences a year; we can't possibly cover them all with the three
> of us.\

I can also speak but it does effect me financially but as many know I
don't like to travel much. Anywhere in North America is no sweat.

>
> Travel sponsorships allow other members of our community to promote and
> educate about PostgreSQL in many, many more places.  I know that if we'd
> had travel money available in 2003, I would have gone to conferences in
> Brazil and Indonesia to promote PostgreSQL -- that was a big part of the
> reason why Robert Treat and Greg Mullaine started to put together a
> non-profit in the first place.

Right.

>
>> 2.      If the answer to (1) is "yes", what weight do such cases
>> carry compared to other possible expenditures, such as paying coders
>> for features; paying for hardware or network service; paying for
>> community presence at exhibitions (e.g. getting a "commercial" booth
>> at a trade fair); paying for marketing such as advertisements,
>> conference "swag", release CDs, and the like; paying for tools for
>> individual (or groups of) developers, such as real copies of the SQL
>> standard; or even paying for entry to the "industry" groups or
>> standards like TPC, ANSI, &c.?  The list is not exhaustive; make up
>> your own case.
>
> Personally, I think it's co-equal with the things above categorically,
> *except* for paying for a commercial booth at a conference, which I feel
> should be our lowest priority if we have cash just lying around.  It's the
> most expensive item, with the lowest benefit to the community.

In general I agree with this.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



--

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Call for Donations
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Call for Donations