Marc,
> But ... if he "re-submitted" the same article a second time, then most likely
> it got rejected for exactly the right reason: it was a duplicate posting. Why
> didn't you approve the one that actually *was* in the moderation queue? :(
Actually, that's a buggy filter. It really should not be filtering out
"duplicate" messages with timestamps hours apart. The
post-bounce-subscribe-repost cycle happens *all the time* and that
filter makes a subscriber wait for me to get to them in the hold queue
(which sometimes I don't, due to 100+ spams per list per day) even
though they resoved the "problem" themselves.
So please correct that filter so that it behaves intelligently. Thanks!
--Josh Berkus
