Tom Lane wrote:
> Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes:
>
>> 'exists' isn't a good name for function :(.
>>
>
> Yeah, that isn't going to work. Perhaps "ifexists"? Or just leave well
> enough alone.
>
>
>
Darn. Can't have been thinking clearly this morning.
How about "exist" (no s)?
cheers
andrew
