Re: continued segmentation fault - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Geoffrey
Subject Re: continued segmentation fault
Date
Msg-id 451C3D2E.3020705@3times25.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: continued segmentation fault  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-general
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:57:09PM -0400, Geoffrey wrote:
>> We continue to have segmentation faults of the /usr/bin/postgres process
>>  as I mentioned in an earlier thread.  In all cases, the core file
>> always indicates a segmentation fault, but the backtraces don't seem to
>> consistently point to any particular problem.  Then again, when you go
>> stomping around in memory where you don't belong, all bets are probably off.
>
> 99% of the time random segmentation faults are memory trouble. Have you
> tried memtest86 on the machine in question?

No, but that's a thought.  We actually have two machines that are
clustered and we see the problem on both.  Once is carrying a heavier
load, thus it happens there more often.

--
Until later, Geoffrey

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
  - Benjamin Franklin

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Geoffrey
Date:
Subject: Re: continued segmentation fault
Next
From: Ben
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib/levenshtein() has a bug?