Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zdenek Kotala
Subject Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)
Date
Msg-id 451A860E.8080604@sun.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)  (Kenneth Marshall <ktm@it.is.rice.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane napsal(a):
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes:
>> The problem was generated, because -fast option was set only for the 
>> compiler and not for the linker. Linker takes wrong version of 
>> libraries. If   -fast is set for both then horology test is OK, but 
>> question was if float optimalization should generate some problems.
> 
> So FAQ_Solaris needs to tell people to put -fast in both CFLAGS and
> LDFLAGS?

Exactly, but I want to sure, that float optimalization is safe and 
should be applied for postgres, because -fast breaks IEE754 standard. If 
it is OK I will adjust FAQ_Solaris.
Zdenek


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Buildfarm alarms
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: psql service parameter