Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)
Date
Msg-id 45194D88.2080703@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes:
>   
>> But the question is if the "-fast" flag is good for postgres. The -fast 
>> flag sets "brutal" floating point optimization and some operation should 
>> have less precision. Is possible verify that floating point operation 
>> works well?
>>     
>
> That's a pretty good way to guarantee that you'll break the datetime
> code.
>
>   

!      | @ 6 years                     | @ 5 years 12 mons 5 days 6 hours



Doesn't this look odd regardless of what bad results come back from the 
FP library?

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_hba.conf: 'trust' vs. 'md5' Issues
Next
From: Jeff Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_hba.conf: 'trust' vs. 'md5' Issues