Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Date
Msg-id 4514308C.9040604@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Responses Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:58:04AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 22:22:12 -0700,
>>   Tom Dunstan <pgsql@tomd.cc> wrote:
>>> That's a worthwhile point. How many patches come from the general 
>>> community vs out of the blue? Patches from regulars could probably get a 
>>> free pass, which might cut down the review burden substantially.
>> And how were you planning to tell if a patch cam from a regular? Hopefully
>> you weren't planning on blindly trusting the "from" header.
>> Misuse of the build farm in a way the effects other sites could get the
>> project a big black eye, so you want to be very careful building and
>> executing code from the patch queue.
> 
> Of course not, but there's any number of ways we could handle that
> problem.

pgp signed patches?


-- 
   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997             http://www.commandprompt.com/
 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Release Notes: Major Changes in 8.2
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: silent install: silent error (even using the manual)