Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Markus Schaber
Subject Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
Date
Msg-id 4513A91D.60501@logix-tt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as  (Guy Thornley <guy@esphion.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi, Guy,

Guy Thornley wrote:

> Of course you could argue the OS should be able to detect this, and prevent
> it occuring anyway. I don't know anything about linux's behaviour in this
> area.

Yes, one can argue that way.

But a generic Algorithm in the OS can never be as smart as the
application which has more informations about semantics and algorithms.
Everything else would need a crystal ball device :-)

HTH,
Markus

--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf.     | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Arjen van der Meijden
Date:
Subject: Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"
Next
From: nicky
Date:
Subject: Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"