Re: Parallel Apply - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrei Lepikhov
Subject Re: Parallel Apply
Date
Msg-id 45138fb7-0413-4ee5-a7c9-d4f970b7f9d2@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Parallel Apply  ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 16/12/25 12:35, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Dear hackers,
> 
> I have been spending time for benchmarking the patch set. Here is an updated
> report.
>
I apologise if my question is incorrect. But what about asynchronous 
replication? Does this method help to reduce lag?

My case is a replica located far from the main instance. There are an 
inevitable lag exists. Do your benchmarks provide any insights into the 
lag reduction? Or the WALsender process that decodes WAL records from a 
hundred actively committing backends, a bottleneck here?

-- 
regards, Andrei Lepikhov,
pgEdge



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Improve logical replication usability when tables lack primary keys
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: Additional message in pg_terminate_backend