Bill Moran wrote:
> - No reliability. On slow days, WAL logs could take a long time to
> rotate, so small but important transactions might not be replicated
> for a long time.
>
So it is all right for backup but for replication it could end up laking
too much behind, and a fail over could be hours behind.
So PITR can be used, but one of the cons is the unpredictable delay of
data. I thought one of the ideas behind the PITR system was to get
rather reason backups of data ...
/BL
