Re: Deadlock detected - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Deadlock detected
Date
Msg-id 4501.987180015@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Deadlock detected  ("Brian J. France" <postgresql@firehawksystems.com>)
List pgsql-general
"Brian J. France" <postgresql@firehawksystems.com> writes:
>   I am getting a few of these errors in my web logs and didn't know what I could do to stop it.

> NOTICE:  Deadlock detected -- See the lock(l) manual page for a possible cause.

> Error in query "UPDATE <table> SET <field> = <value> WHERE <field2> = <value2>" : ERROR:  WaitOnLock: error on wakeup
-Aborting this transaction 

> Is this due to the hash index on field2 or due to the has index in general?

Don't use hash indexes for concurrent applications.  I don't really know
of any reason for preferring a hash index over a btree index in any case.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Justin S."
Date:
Subject: Shared memory failure?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump dying (and VACUUM ANALYZE woes)...