Re: On DNS for postgresql.org - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Steve Crawford
Subject Re: On DNS for postgresql.org
Date
Msg-id 44FF02F9.50309@pinpointresearch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to On DNS for postgresql.org  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
List pgsql-general
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that the DNS is back (thanks!), I thought I'd ask why the ra bit
> is set on the responses.  Are those servers providing recursion to
> the whole Net?  (They seem to be.)  If so, that's a Bad Thing.
>
> A
>

Yes, they do seem to be and yes it probably is a Bad Thing:

$ dig @ns3.hub.org www.mysql.com

; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> @ns3.hub.org www.mysql.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 58427
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.mysql.com.                 IN      A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.mysql.com.          3600    IN      A       213.115.162.29
www.mysql.com.          3600    IN      A       213.115.162.82
www.mysql.com.          3600    IN      A       213.136.52.29
www.mysql.com.          3600    IN      A       213.136.52.82

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
mysql.com.              3600    IN      NS      dns1.mysql.com.
mysql.com.              3600    IN      NS      dns2.mysql.com.
mysql.com.              3600    IN      NS      dns3.mysql.com.
mysql.com.              3600    IN      NS      dns5.mysql.com.

;; Query time: 409 msec
;; SERVER: 200.46.204.254#53(200.46.204.254)
;; WHEN: Wed Sep  6 10:15:56 2006
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 171

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: On DNS for postgresql.org
Next
From:
Date:
Subject: WG: postgres and emacs on windows os