Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Date
Msg-id 44FB9967.6040400@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> 
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> Oh, lots of grunt work.  I can see that working, but at a high cost.
>>
>>   
> 
> I doubt it. Let's just start with bugs, since that's the easy case 
> anyway. Our real volume is pretty low, so the cost of maintaining it 
> should not be high. I am assuming we would not be including HEAD, but 
> only stable branches. With HEAD the volume would be quite a bit higher, 
> but not impossibly so.

The email interface to bugzilla has potential. I *think* with a nominal 
amount of work, we should be able to modify it, so that a person could 
reply to the bug and it would correct associate as a bug.

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> cheers
> 
> andrew
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>       match
> 


-- 
   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997             http://www.commandprompt.com/
 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: gBorg status?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta