Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> My objection here is basically that this proposal passed on the
>>> assumption that it would be very nearly zero effort to make it happen.
>>>
>
>
>> Kicking out autovacuum as default is a disaster, it took far too long to
>> get in the backend already (wasn't it planned for 8.0?).
>>
>
> If it's so "disastrous" to not have it, why wasn't it even proposed
> until two weeks after feature freeze?
To me, this proposal was just too obvious, for reasons already discussed
earlier.
Regards,
Andreas
