Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Zoltan Boszormenyi
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
Date
Msg-id 44F32BF2.7040709@dunaweb.hu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera írta:
> Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>
>
>>> I think at this point is someone else's judgement whether you can put it
>>> back or not.  Tom already said that he doesn't object to the feature per
>>> se; no one else seems opposed to the feature per se, in fact.
>>>
>>> Now, I don't really see _how_ to do it in nice code, so no, I don't have
>>> any suggestion for you.  You may want to give the pumpkin to Tom so that
>>> he gives the patch the finishing touches (hopefully making it support
>>> the "COPY view" feature as well).
>>>
>>> If it were up to me, I'd just commit it as is (feature-wise -- more
>>> thorough review is still needed) and revisit the COPY view stuff in 8.3
>>> if there is demand.
>>>
>> OK, I will put it back as it was in v8
>> keeping all your other cleanup and
>> let Bruce and Tom decide.
>>
>
> Hum, are you going to put back the original cruft to support copy view?
> I suggest you don't do that.
>

Well, the other way around is to teach heap_open()
to use views. Brrr. Would it be any cleaner?


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO