Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Pflug
Subject Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql
Date
Msg-id 44F1B164.8050304@pse-consulting.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> My take on all this is that there's no one-size-fits-all replication
> solution, and therefore the right approach is to have multiple active
> subprojects. 
Anybody knowing  a little about the world of replication needs will
agree with you here. Unfortunately, AFAICS pgcluster can't be added as
module as e.g. Slony-I, since it's rather a not-so-small patch to the
pgsql sources. So I wonder if it's possible to provide some
not-too-intrusive hooks in core pgsql, enabling pgcluster to do most of
the work in modules, to have the best of both worlds: core with as few
modifications as possible, and modules extending the operation,
profiting from backend development immediately.

Regards,
Andreas




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [Open Item] Re: Autovacuum on by default?