>>
>> It is very, very common to have asynchronous replication. I would say
>> the need for synchronous is far more limited (although greater desired).
>
> I would imagine that multi-master synchronous replication would be
> fairly trivial to implement with 2PC and wal-shipping available, no?
Trivial? I would say... no. There is a reason it hasn't been done yet,
and a reason why CMD (for example) has zero plans to even try.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
