Re: Autovacuum on by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthew T. O'Connor
Subject Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Date
Msg-id 44E49C55.7010606@zeut.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Autovacuum on by default?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Re: Autovacuum on by default?
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is it time to turn on autovacuum by default in 8.2?  I know we wanted to 
> be on the side of caution with 8.1, but perhaps we should evaluate the 
> experiences now.  Comments?

Would be fine by me, but I'm curious to see what the community has to 
say.  A few comments:

Autovacuum can cause unpredictable performance issues, that is if it 
vacuums in the middle of a busy day and people don't want that, of 
course they turn it off easy enough, but they might be surprised.

I haven't played with CVS HEAD much, but I think the logging issue has 
been addressed no?  That is my single biggest gripe with the 8.1 
autovacuum is that it's very hard to see if it's actually done anything 
without having to turn up the logging significantly.

The remaining big ticket items for autovacuum are the maintenance window 
that Alvaro and I have just been discussing, and multiple concurrent 
vacuum, (possibly you could add the continued reduction of vacuum impact 
but that just a constant thing).  Do we think it's worth waiting for 
either of these two features prior to turning on autovacuum by default?

Matt


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum on by default?