Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
Date
Msg-id 44E47B7E.3050606@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> 
>>Ever since pgsql-patches replies started going to -hackers, threading 
>>doesn't work anymore, so I for one can't tell what this refers to at 
>>all.
> 
> Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
> either.  Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to revert
> to the old way?

I'd vote for reverting to the old way. Anyone serious about hacking 
should be on both lists.

Joe


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting