Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From mdean
Subject Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date
Msg-id 44E22690.9050108@xn1.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> I am suggesting that.  I have heard all the old discussions about not 
>> using a bugtracker, but in all fairness, I think some of us have to 
>> create critical mass and get something started.
>
>
> I will install anything, and everything, if you can get some sort of 
> concensus on which one to try / go with ... so far, all discussions 
> have ended with nobody coming close to agreeing to anything :)
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services 
> (http://www.hub.org)
> Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . 
> scrappy@hub.org
> Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
quite frankly, I think this group needs the same kind of consensus found 
in Torvalds kernel group.  Is anyone denying their approach gets better 
results!?  No flatline there. JMUASFANPWWMR!


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.10/418 - Release Date: 8/14/2006



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: insert/update/delete returning and rules
Next
From: "korryd@enterprisedb.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] PL instrumentation plugin and Rendezvous variable