David Fetter wrote:
> If it were just me laying out the boundary, I'd say that anything that
> changes the grammar of SQL--for example, adding FULL
> DISJUNCTION--can't really be a viable trial outside the main
> distribution channels and deserves a couple of versions' stay in one
> of those channels if it passes the scrutiny of -hackers. I'd love to
> see a "main distribution channel" that's not contrib, but that's for
> the future and full disjunctions are now. :)
>
>
>
As I understand it, FD as implemented does not require a grammar change.
Arguably, a more complete implementation would have support at the SQL
level, and then it would have to go in core, without question.
cheers
andrew
