Re: 8.2 features status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: 8.2 features status
Date
Msg-id 44D9FB67.4060908@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.2 features status  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> What this story does do for me is reinforce the notion that it's
> critical for newbie developers to work "in the open", getting feedback
> from the lists at an early stage about what they are doing.  If you go
> off in a corner and develop a patch for a TODO item, you risk having it
> rejected because you misunderstood what the TODO item was about.

I 100% agree with this. Newbie developers should be in the open and it 
kind of lends itself to my Mentors idea that I mentioned previously.

The problem I see is that even if they are in the open we make it fairly 
difficult to get the information they need to get started.

> 
> Maybe the connection is that while thinking about processes, we need
> to take into account the need to encourage people to get early
> feedback about what they are considering doing.

Agreed.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 


-- 
   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997             http://www.commandprompt.com/
 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Next
From: "korryd@enterprisedb.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal for PL packages for 8.3.