Re: 8.2 features status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: 8.2 features status
Date
Msg-id 44D40030.7010508@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.2 features status  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 8.2 features status
Re: 8.2 features status
Re: 8.2 features status
List pgsql-hackers
> I tend to agree --- I don't see much value in trying to institute a
> formalized process.  We have not had that many cases where lack of
> communication was a problem.

How do you know? Seriously... this comes up at least twice a year :). 
There is probably a basis for it.

As I was saying on #postgresql, the current system works well for a 
small group of developers. I don't think there is any arguing that.

However, there is a larger group out there, that would likely be willing 
to contribute but we are a bit of a black box, or perhaps we are too 
transparent?? I am not sure which.

Frankly, I don't care if we ever get a bug tracker or use trac. However 
a more formalized communication process is sorely needed IMHO.

I am actually hoping that jabber.postgresql.org would help that in the 
long run.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997             http://www.commandprompt.com/
 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Patch to allow C extension modules to initialize/finish
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status