Re: 8.2 features status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: 8.2 features status
Date
Msg-id 44D38395.5060006@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.2 features status  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 8.2 features status
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com> writes:
> 
>>UPDATE/DELETE for CE are a big deal - I really wish we had INSERT too,
> 
> Huh?  We had INSERT working before, that's why it's not mentioned.

I think what Luke means, is that an INSERT into the base table of the 
inheritance hierarchy with CE enabled gets automagically inserted into 
the correct partition, and as far as I know that still doesn't happen -- 
but I've certainly been wrong before :-).

Joe


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status