Re: Best Procedural Language? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Best Procedural Language?
Date
Msg-id 44D03287.5030404@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Best Procedural Language?  ("Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>)
List pgsql-general
Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
> Well, the surprise for me is: this is exactly what I thought! I actually do
> have a lot of string manipulation to do, but I am the only one on the team
> with Tcl experience. For the sake of other developers I thought that the
> plPHP project would be interesting, but I don't get the impression that it
> is as well-developed as plTcl. Does anyone know anything about it?

plPHP is not as mature as plTcl (or is that plTclng). However it is very
well developed and maintained. Heck, companies are even holding talks
and training classes on it now.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
--

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Best Procedural Language?
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: LISTEN considered dangerous