Re: Best Procedural Language? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Best Procedural Language?
Date
Msg-id 44D023B3.6050809@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Best Procedural Language?  ("Ian Harding" <harding.ian@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Best Procedural Language?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-general
>>  - Doing a lot of DB manipulation in pl/Perl or pl/Tcl or such
>>    requires having an extra level of function manipulations that
>>    won't be as natural as straight pl/pgsql.
>
> Another important distinguishing characteristic is whether it supports
> set returning functions.  I think only plpgsql does right now.

Actually no. Plperl, plphp, plruby and I believe even pl/Tcl support set
returning functions.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>       match
>


--

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Carlo Stonebanks"
Date:
Subject: Re: Best Procedural Language?
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Best Procedural Language?