Tom Lane wrote:
> Here's what I've got so far. I think there's probably more gold to be
> mined in terms of reducing runtime memory consumption (I don't like the
> list_free_deep bit, we should use a context), but functionally it seems
> complete. I'm off to dinner again, it's in your court to look over some
> more if you want.
>
> (PS: if you want to apply, go ahead, don't forget catversion bump.)
Committed, with catversion bump.
Joe
