Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Date
Msg-id 44CE7A45.70400@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
List pgsql-patches
Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:19:43PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>>>> The good news is that from a memory and perfomance standpoint, my simple
>>>> test now shows us outperforming mysql:
>>> Sweet ;-)
>> I love this team.  Kudos!
>
> So now it's MySQL users' turn to say, "Sure, but speed isn't
> everything...." :-)

"Sure, but speed isn't everything... We can accept 02/31/2006 as a valid
date. Let's see PostgreSQL do that!"

Joshua D. Drake

>


--

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Forcing current WAL file to be archived