Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical
Date
Msg-id 44CE1976.5000905@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical maximums.)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> I think I've read that there are multi-hundred GB PostgreSQL
>> databases.
>>
>> Since pg_dump is single-threaded, how long does it take to back up
>> such a database?
>
> The evasive answer is that you probably don't run regular full pg_dump
> on such databases.

Hmmm.

>> Are there any plans of making a multi-threaded, or even
>> multi-process pg_dump?
>
> What do you hope to accomplish by that?  pg_dump is not CPU bound.

Write to multiple tape drives at the same time, thereby reducing the
total wall time of the backup process.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEzhl2S9HxQb37XmcRArRoAKDiVOicD7giL2lWF5zMa9qQanwXjQCfdY6r
0eswQQ5nJb8l5Mbp+ok0ZRs=
=MWSM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Christian Rengstl"
Date:
Subject: Antw: Re: Query questions
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Antw: Re: Query questions