Re: PostgreSQL theoretical maximums. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: PostgreSQL theoretical maximums.
Date
Msg-id 44C9011A.5070504@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL theoretical maximums.  ("Karen Hill" <karen_hill22@yahoo.com>)
Responses Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical maximums.)  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
List pgsql-general
Karen Hill wrote:
> How many tables can PostgreSQL theoretically and then practically
> handle?  What is the largest database size possible?  What was the
> biggest database you've ever had on PostgreSQL?  What were the
> challenges and what kind of hardware and OS works best?

Maximum number of tables etc. is a FAQ:
   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ.html#item4.4

It's been running on unix-like systems for much longer than Windows.
Apart from that, the best system is probably determined by your experience.

> What is an effective way to predict database size when designing
> tables?

Rule-of-thumb - assume 3-5 times the size of the raw data to allow for
overhead, indexes etc. Other than that, you can find details of on-disk
formats for rows towards the end of the manuals.

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ken Johanson
Date:
Subject: Backslash as ordinary char vs. not; set via a connection/session variable
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL theoretical maximums.