Re: 64-bit integers for GUC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: 64-bit integers for GUC
Date
Msg-id 44C662DB.1020605@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 64-bit integers for GUC  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: 64-bit integers for GUC  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter,

> I wonder whether platforms with INT64_IS_BROKEN can address more than 2GB of 
> memory anyway.
> 

To be quite frank, current PostgreSQL can't effectively use more than 
256mb of work_mem anyway.  We'd like to fix that, but it's not fixed yet 
AFAIK.

--Josh


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: On-disk bitmap index patch
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: On-disk bitmap index patch