Re: effective_cache_size is a real? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: effective_cache_size is a real?
Date
Msg-id 44C55771.2080206@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to effective_cache_size is a real?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter,

> Is it intentional that effective_cache_size is a real (as opposed to 
> integer)?  The initial revision of guc.c already has it that way, so it 
> was probably blindly adapted from the previous adhockery that had all 
> planner variables be doubles.
> 

I beleive that it's a real because the other query estimate variables 
are reals.  Might be worth checking the estimation code to make sure 
that changing the type won't break anything.

--Josh


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [Fwd: dblink patch - Asynchronous queries and parallel
Next
From: Chris Browne
Date:
Subject: Help! - Slony-I - saving/setting/restoring GUC