Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Lor
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Date
Msg-id 44C41BAF.7010701@sun.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>As I understand this, the probe file is compiled into some sort of 
>object file which is linked into the binary.  
>
Correct.

>So if we ever have probes 
>in other components, we'd probably want to have separate probe source 
>and object files for them.  That would seem better than one big probe 
>file that is linked in everywhere.
>
>  
>
We agreed that there would only be one provider called postgresql, and I 
believe (need to double check) all the probes have to be defined in the 
same provider in the same file. What you suggest sounds like a good way 
to separate probes from different components.

Regards,
-Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Lor
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: RESET CONNECTION?