Re: Performance penalty for remote access of postgresql - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From David Boreham
Subject Re: Performance penalty for remote access of postgresql
Date
Msg-id 44BF8B32.8020507@boreham.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance penalty for remote access of postgresql (8.1.3)? any experiance?  ("Guoping Zhang" <guoping.zhang@nec.com.au>)
List pgsql-performance
Guoping Zhang wrote:

>
>a)  SERVER A to SERVER B: 0.35ms
>    SERVER A to itself (Local host): 0.022ms
>
>
>
0.35ms seems rather slow. You might try investigating what's in the path.
For comparison, between two machines here (three GigE switches in the
path), I see 0.10ms RTT. Between two machines on the same switch I
get 0.08ms.





pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Guoping Zhang"
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance penalty for remote access of postgresql (8.1.3)? any experiance?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL