Yes. That works. I think that the parser should work properly either way.
Paul
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Paul Tilles wrote:
>
>> Version postgres 7.4.7:
>>
>> Following sql
>>
>> UPDATE tablename SET value = 0.0 where value!=-9.4;
>>
>> results in the error message
>>
>> ERROR: operator does not exist: smallint !=- integer
>> HINT: No operator matches the given name and argument type(s). You may
>> need to add explicit type casts.
>>
>
> Have you tried?
>
> value != -9.4
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>> Seems that postgres has a problem parsing a "not equal negative value".
>>
>> Anybody know if this is fixed in later versions?
>>
>> Paul Tilles
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org
>>
>
>